To listen to the audio version, click here: Bacon_final_Big_House_3-28-14
One debate I could do without is the question of who is a real Michigan fan, and who isn’t?
On the face of it, the question is pretty stupid. A Michigan fan is a fan of Michigan. And beyond the surface, it’s still pretty stupid. But let’s play it out.
The argument goes that only those who attended Michigan can call themselves Michigan fans. The rest? They’re mere “Walmart Wolverines”—fans who could have picked any school to cheer for, as well as any other, just like we pick the pro teams we want to follow, with no other connection than geography.
(I realize the term is often used by Michigan’s rivals to demean those who didn’t attend the school, but I’m writing here about the more general distinction between alumni and “fans,” which exists at most schools. And if you don’t think it exists at Michigan, ask any Michigan fan who didn’t attend the school what they too often hear from the alums.)
Why shouldn’t hard-cord alumni turn their backs on their non-degreed brethren?
There’s a history here, going back to James B. Angell, Michigan’s longest serving, and most important, president. He took office in 1871 – eight years before Michigan’s first football game – and served until 1909, charting a course for Michigan that the University still follows, and other schools adopted. A Brown University alum and former faculty member, Angell’s vision for Michigan was to create a university that could provide “an uncommon education for the common man.”
He was thrilled to see the sons and daughters of farmers and factory workers becoming philosophers, but he couldn’t stand the game of football they – and everyone else – loved so much. Having seen first-hand the hysteria the sport created on campus, he wrote his fellow Big Ten presidents during that momentous 1905 season with great concern.
“The absorbing interest and excitement of the students – not to speak of the public – in the preparation for the intercollegiate games make a damaging invasion into the proper work of the university for the first ten or twelve weeks of the academic year. This is not true of the players alone, but of the main body of students, who think and talk of little else but the game.”
President Angell simply hoped to return college athletics to the English ideal, which allowed for more student participation and less notoriety for the victors. The idea of strangers with no connection to the University paying to watch them play struck him as odd and possibly dangerous.
But Angell failed to see football’s value in pitching his public school to the taxpayers, who picked up over 90-percent of the budget until the 1960s, missing the point that for many Michiganders, there were few other reasons to support the state school. If you were a farmer in Fennville or a factory worker in Flint, why would you vote for millage after millage to go to the state universities?
My answer is the Big House. As Notre Dame coach Frank Leahy once said, “A school without football is in danger of deteriorating into a medieval study hall.” To which Bear Bryant added, “It’s kind of hard to rally around a math class.”
Football, then and now, serves as the one place on campus where everyone feels welcome. On any given Saturday, fully a quarter of the 100,000 folks who pack the Big House did not attend the school. They include some of the University’s most loyal fans, and biggest donors.
According to Nate Silver—yes, that Nate Silver, who correctly predicted every state in the 2012 presidential election— the nation’s three biggest college football fan bases are Ohio State’s (3.2 million), Michigan’s (2.9 million), and Penn State’s (2.6 million), for a total of about 8.7 million fans, which is more than the entire Pac-12 combined. These three schools usually lead the nation in home attendance, too.
These stats teach a few less obvious but equally important lessons, too. If these teams depended solely on their students and alumni for support, they would have only about a fifth of their current following, since the “subway alums” constitute roughly 80-percent of their fan base.
Turning our attention back to the Big Ten’s “Big Three” programs, and the 8.7 millions fans who follow them: their gigantic stadiums hold more than three hundred thousand fans, but that still leaves 8.4 million of their followers on the outside looking in, which those fans eagerly do through TV and the Internet. If you want to know why the Big Ten Network was the first conference network, and is by far the most successful, that’s where you start: 17.5 million fans, dwarfing the next-biggest fan base, the SEC’s, at 13.6 million. And that’s why the Big Ten Network now reaches an estimated 53 million households: because it can.
The Big Ten’s 17.5 million fans undoubtedly include just about every demographic you can name in substantial numbers, but it’s what they have in common that’s most important here: a shared love of their favorite Big Ten schools and the conference itself, its history and traditions, right down to their memories of the same games.
Joining a hundred thousand like-minded strangers solves a modern problem, too. The Dalai Lama and Mother Teresa have both noted that the great disease of Western civilization is loneliness. Yes, it’s possible to be lonely in a crowd—but not this one.
Studies show our endorphins spike when we march in formation, sing in unison, or cheer together in a stadium. Where else can you be certain a hundred thousand other people are feeling exactly what you’re feeling, exactly when you’re feeling it? This is why such places are more important now than ever.
Think about it. The Big Ten’s twelve teams do not play one game that’s not televised. You can sit back in your easy chair right at home and watch every game for free. Likewise, every song in the world can be purchased for a few bucks, and every movie is on DVD. Yet we still go to concerts, movies, and games, just as our ancestors did almost century ago. If Beethoven, Humphrey Bogart, or Fielding H. Yost visited those places today, they would think almost nothing had changed.
Why do we pay money to go to these places? Because we need to be together.
Ken Fischer has run the internationally acclaimed University Musical Society for years with a simple philosophy: “Everybody in. Nobody Out.” If the UMS, which has played host to everyone from Marian Anderson to Leonard Bernstein to Yo-Yo Ma, can open its arms to everyone, you’d think a football stadium could do the same.
We need to share something we care about with strangers. And to fill that need, you could do worse than Big Ten football.
“We have too much pluribus,” filmmaker Ken Burns said twenty years ago, “and not enough unum.” If that was true then, before the flourishing of private schools, charter schools and home schooling; before the creation of 500 TV stations that allow us to pick what kind of news we want to hear; before the internet allowed us to see only the information and people we want, and ignore the rest; it is surely more true now.
Dr. Ed Zeiders, the pastor of St. Paul’s United Methodist Church right in downtown State College, has seen what the football team can do for the faithful in ways others might not.
“We are desperately needy,” he told me. “We need something to cheer about and rally around. Our culture is devoid of these things.
“We need a place to stand, and a people to stand with, and a cause to stand for. That is not original with me. That came out of World Methodism. And those three propositions hold the key to healthy and value-oriented living. I’ve taught and preached that for a lot of years.
“I have this belief that academics should be that unifying principle, but the evidence points to something else.”
While “Pastor Ed” has done a fine job creating that environment in his church, he joked with me that he couldn’t help but notice that the one down the street holds 108,000 true believers.
“Sports has the capacity to make that happen. That can get skewed and twisted, especially in the marketing side of the equation, but my interest in sports is more in the community that forms around them. What my wife and I enjoy is the friendships we create in the stands. There is an ease with which sports fans connect with each other. And it has the potential to hold up something that is admirable and unifying.”
College football stadiums are now one of the few remaining places where we connect across race and religion, age and gender, economics and politics. And we do it with vigor.
When Fielding Yost opened Michigan Stadium in 1927, it seated 84,000 fans – three times the population of tiny Ann Arbor. It has played host to Heisman heroes, national champions, presidents, prime ministers, poet laureates, and over 40 million fans. It’s where Michigan fans showed the nation how to tailgate, and do the wave.
At one of the world’s great universities, this is the front porch. When you walk through the front gates, no one should care – and most don’t — about your age or income, or your race, religion or creed. Most don’t even care if you went to school there. They care about one thing: Can you sing “The Victors”? If you know when to throw your fist in the air, you’re in.
Welcome to the Big House. Hail.
* * * * *
Please join the conversation, but remember: I run only those letters from those who are not profane or insane, and who include their FULL name.
Radio stuff: On Friday mornings, these commentaries run at 8:50 on Michigan Radio (91.7 Ann Arbor/Detroit and Flint, and 104.1 Grand Rapids), and a few minutes later, I join Sam Webb and Ira Weintraub LIVE from 9:05 to 9:25 on WTKA.com, 1050 AM.
On Sunday mornings, from the start of football season to the end of March Madness, I co-host “Off the Field” with the legendary Jamie Morris on WTKA from 10-11 a.m. And yes, there will be a quiz, so “stop what you’re doing, and listen!”
Like this story? Please feed the blog, and keep ’em coming!
Follow me on Twitter: http://twitter.com/johnubacon. Almost 10,000. THANK YOU!
John you did it again. Great article and emotional as ever. Thank you for being you and such a interesting writer.
Dan Lord
John, great as usual, coming from PSU and adopting UofM over 30 years ago, I’m one of those fans who bleed blue even though I’m not an alumni, but in many ways feel as though I am. You are right, we have made great lasting friendships at the Big House that transcends far beyond our football Saturdays with our fellow ticket holders. I look forward to reading each of your articles.
John,
I was a Michigan “fan” until I moved to Columbus, Ohio and met Woody Hayes. The danger that concerned President Angell, and has come to pass, is that Michigan’s #1 identity is the football team and the money that it generates.
I am still a “fan” of Michigan and Woody and Bo. What I am no longer a fan of is the fact that most football school athletes are not much interested in getting an education.
When Hesberg and Joyce decided to deemphasize Notre Dame
football, at a time when I lived in Indiana, wiser heads
tried to explain what was going to happen next, fund raising and winning experienced a serious decline.
The danger in the fan phenomena is that winning has become the only reason for loyalty. I know because it happened to me. The traditions of great universities
gave way to the final numbers on a scoreboard on Saturday
afternoon. And the purpose of every university, “the providing of an uncommon education for the common man,”
finished a distant second.
If you don’t believe that the downhill slide is gathering
speed, watch what happens, now that Northwestern University athletes and the United Steel Workers are going to show you the benefits of having union football players. At some time a university will have to deal with a team that refuses to play until their paycheck is enriched. Think it can’t happen here? Watch and wait.
I enjoy your blogs and insights into reality.
bomberjohn5
I think your arguments are sound, but you’re making the case to the choir while ignoring the real source of contention, i.e. an overwhelming majority of “Walmart Wolverine” calls don’t come from those who root for Michigan.
On our boards I’ve rarely noticed Michigan fans caring all that much how other Michigan fans came to be Michigan fans, and when someone does they’re often attacked by the rest. MGoBlog readers (by design) tend to be a more thoughtful slice of the Michigan fanbase; still, that’s a large enough segment that the relative absence of alumni-only arrogance suggests it’s not very prevalent in the general population.
You’ll note this kind of argument doesn’t happen so much in Nebraska, or Ohio. If it really was a class distinction between those who went to the outstanding big state university versus those who collect on its front porch, wouldn’t you expect it to be most prevalent in places where one big school dominates the state?
What I’m getting at is the primary source of “Walverine” complaints isn’t from Michigan fans but MSU fans. Intrinsic to this (and, I imagine, any) in-state rivalry is that one university is necessarily “better” than its rival. State fans, whether they were always such or became so when Michigan turned them down, have little appreciation for those who overplay the barely appreciable institutional differences between Michigan and Michigan State.
They have even less appreciation for non-alumni/non-student Michigan fans who bring up State’s position in the scholastic pecking order, hence the vitriol for “Walmart Wolverines.” There are some snobby alumni of every school who believe collegiate fandom ought to be reserved for alumni, but so few it’s not worth making a case against them. The real engine behind this “Walmart Wolverine” business is the perception among State fans that non-alumni Michigan fans are hypocritically going around knocking MSU degrees. That and their understandable frustration at the X% of residents of their state without a dog in the fight who’ve chosen to side with the enemy.
Then again I’m not really sure what I’m advocating here, since “go speak sense to contentious Spartans” would be a just as futile errand, if for entirely different reasons.
I think this article relates directly to a theme that you have emphasized before, John. The sense of community, of sharing a common experience, as you point out, is the valuable part of college sports. But this sense must be authentic, it can’t be manufactured or manipulated. In other words–it is in tension with the drive to create and enhance a “brand.”
Two small (and quite different) examples: (1) the most important football game is now played on Thanksgiving weekend, when students traditionally go home and cannot attend. (2) Fans at a UM home basketball game are bombarded with sounds and pictures for every second of every time out, and even during play, as if the people in charge simply do not trust that the game itself–the sport–could possibly be enough. They are selling a “product.” But as you have pointed out, if we are looking just for a product, we will watch the NFL or the NBA.
I hope the new president will have the insight and the courage to save Michigan sports from itself.
Thanks John,
I was a season ticket holder for 40 years with 4 friends who did not attend Michigan. Those who sat near us in section 19 became our friends who we still remember.
I do not think that those who use the term “Walverines” care about an intellectual discussion of the term. Its purpose is to ridicule or hurt. Pitiful.
Great article John! I wish Dave Brandon had the same “all in” attitude. If he were trying to offend and eliminate the “little guy” and families, he’s going about it the right way. Many long-time loyal fans have given up their football, basketball and hockey tickets because of the HUGE price increases in recent years. Many fans can’t afford to go to the games in person any more. The University Athletic Department is getting more like a private club for the wealthy and less like a public university. I understand the need for funding all the sports but the millions in surplus generated the last few years at the expense of the Wolverine fans is absurd. I hope the current strategy does not come back to haunt us going forward by keeping many future Michigan fans away from the Big House, Crisler and Yost because they’re trying to turn a profit at a state run institution.
I grew up in Lansing, and I was an MSU fan from birth. I ended up attending MSU, but even had I not I would have been an MSU fan for life. No way do I think you have to attend a university to be a fan.
However, I know many UM fans who are Wolverines simply because the school has traditionally been a winner. They couldn’t find Ann Arbor with a map, but reap untold joy with rubbing MSU’s nose in losing dirt. Over the years, though, many of those types have become UM football fans and MSU basketball fans–the worst form of mutant. Now, the waters are even become more muddied with some jumping to MSU football because of their recent success.
So, it boils down to some people need to feel better about themselves and cheer for the winners. They have little or no love for the actual institution–as long as it provides a boost to their self-esteem they’ll wear the gear, put out the flags, trash talk with glee. They’re free agent fans who up until the last few years found comfort and solace with the Wolverines. Personally, Michigan can keep them.
great to meet you at the s.w. florida lunch ,thank you.
JOHN,
I AM NOT A MICHIGAN GRAD. JUST A KID THAT GREW UP NEAR THE ATHLETIC COMPLEX AND HAVE LOVED MICHIGAN SINCE THEN.
BLESS THE 4 YEAR GRADUATE THAT ATTENDED GAMES FOR FOUR YEARS AND MOVED ON. I HAVE ATTENDED GAMES FOR 69 YEARS SO PLEASE DON’T CALL ME NAMES. I WAS HERE BEFORE WALMART.
THE BIG TEN NETWORK WAS AVAILABLE THIS WINTER IN NASSAU, BAHAMAS AND I WAS ABLE TO WATCH ALL OF THE MEN’S BASKETBALL GAMES.
IF SOMEONE TOOK AWAY MY MICHIGAN WARDROBE I WOULDN’T HAVE ANYTHING TO WEAR.
John,
A friend of my mine passed away in December. Our friendship, formed over 10 years, was defined by Michigan football. We saw each other only six or seven times a year, during football season, and rarely spoke with one another thoughout the rest of the year. Although our friedship was very specific, his passing hit me harder than I expected. As true Michigan fans know, it is about the game, but there is so much more…
John,
This is a great article! Spot on.
I have always said that the non alumni fans are there because they want to be associated with the university and it’s teams.
There are tons of colleges that would love to have a big base of non-alumni fans.
I have never liked the “Wal-mart Wolverine” thing, but I am all for people jumping on the maize and blue wagon.
Go Blue!
Joe Lynch
PS: I would like to share this on Facebook, but I don’t see a share icon.
I am proud as can be that I am a U of M grad, and almost as proud that my son now is as well. But you’re absolutely right; it IS a stupid assertion that you must be a grad to be a fan. Ironically, the fact that half of your hometown is wearing maize and blue, and that you will see Michigan garb in distant locales when you travel is one of the things that makes a grad the proudest. In an odd way “we” need “them” way more than “they” need “us”! Go Blue!
Oakland University seems to do very well without football.