<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for John U. Bacon</title>
	<atom:link href="http://johnubacon.com/comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://johnubacon.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 11 Feb 2012 18:56:45 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Super Bowl Silliness and Sincerity by Phil</title>
		<link>http://johnubacon.com/2012/02/super-bowl-silliness-and-sincerity/#comment-3763</link>
		<dc:creator>Phil</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 11 Feb 2012 18:56:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://johnubacon.com/?p=733#comment-3763</guid>
		<description>Hi John, Yup, Lame, I would presume the NFL would desire to present family fare, instead we get borderline pornography masked as entertainment, not once, but several years in a row, add to that the gestures by the &quot;entertainers&quot; to the crowd and...I guess I may have to start giving serious consideration to the Puppy bowl. 

What&#039;s wrong with the tried and true marching band representing a tradition that everyone can admire?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi John, Yup, Lame, I would presume the NFL would desire to present family fare, instead we get borderline pornography masked as entertainment, not once, but several years in a row, add to that the gestures by the &#8220;entertainers&#8221; to the crowd and&#8230;I guess I may have to start giving serious consideration to the Puppy bowl. </p>
<p>What&#8217;s wrong with the tried and true marching band representing a tradition that everyone can admire?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Super Bowl Silliness and Sincerity by Dr. Ed Kornblue</title>
		<link>http://johnubacon.com/2012/02/super-bowl-silliness-and-sincerity/#comment-3751</link>
		<dc:creator>Dr. Ed Kornblue</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 11 Feb 2012 16:31:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://johnubacon.com/?p=733#comment-3751</guid>
		<description>John,

You nailed it. What a super appraisal of the Super-Bowl this year! I could not agree with you more.
Keep up the good work.
Dr. Ed Kornblue</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>John,</p>
<p>You nailed it. What a super appraisal of the Super-Bowl this year! I could not agree with you more.<br />
Keep up the good work.<br />
Dr. Ed Kornblue</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Post-Publication Q&amp;A on &#8220;Three and Out,&#8221; Second of Two Batches by Patrick Friedrich</title>
		<link>http://johnubacon.com/2011/12/post-publication-qa-on-three-and-out-second-of-two-batches/#comment-3487</link>
		<dc:creator>Patrick Friedrich</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 05 Feb 2012 22:13:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://johnubacon.com/?p=673#comment-3487</guid>
		<description>I have finished reading &quot;Three and Out&quot; and have the following observations:

On page 61, you write &quot;No ranked 1-A team had ever lost to an 1-AA team.&quot;  In addition to my puzzlement over your use of the article an before a word starting with a consonant sound, I would point out that in 1983, #20 Penn State lost to Cincinnati, then 1-AA, 14-3.

On page 139, you write &quot;The Wolverine defenders soon discovered why when Desmond Tardy ran up to Orton, who tossed the ball to him, pulling off a perfect hook and ladder for the 48-42 victory.&quot;  Unless Tardy was running a ladder (or chair) route, this play should be referred to as a hook and lateral.  The phrase &quot;hook and ladder&quot; is repeated on page 141.

On page 147, you write &quot;Instead of being the team;s savior, with ten returning starters-more than the offense and special teams combined-it gave up an incredible 346 points that season, the most in Michigan history.&quot;  Actually, Michigan gave up 347 points in 2008.

I hope that you have not been too reliant on the Michigan SID for your record &amp; statistical information.  That reliance has caused Coach Hoke to refer to the 2011-12 Wolverine squad as Team 132 &amp; claim the 11 win victory total as the fifth in team history. In fact, last season&#039;s  Michigan squad was Team 134. I include two teams that the Athletic Department does not, the 1878-79 &amp; 1882-83 teams that only played games in the spring. Remember, the academic year does not coincide with the calendar year. Michigan&#039;s 2011-12 eleven wins were matched or exceeded by eight previous Michigan teams: 1901(11), 1902 (11), 1903 (11), 1905 (12), 1971 (11), 1986 (11), 1997 (12), &amp; 2006 (11).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have finished reading &#8220;Three and Out&#8221; and have the following observations:</p>
<p>On page 61, you write &#8220;No ranked 1-A team had ever lost to an 1-AA team.&#8221;  In addition to my puzzlement over your use of the article an before a word starting with a consonant sound, I would point out that in 1983, #20 Penn State lost to Cincinnati, then 1-AA, 14-3.</p>
<p>On page 139, you write &#8220;The Wolverine defenders soon discovered why when Desmond Tardy ran up to Orton, who tossed the ball to him, pulling off a perfect hook and ladder for the 48-42 victory.&#8221;  Unless Tardy was running a ladder (or chair) route, this play should be referred to as a hook and lateral.  The phrase &#8220;hook and ladder&#8221; is repeated on page 141.</p>
<p>On page 147, you write &#8220;Instead of being the team;s savior, with ten returning starters-more than the offense and special teams combined-it gave up an incredible 346 points that season, the most in Michigan history.&#8221;  Actually, Michigan gave up 347 points in 2008.</p>
<p>I hope that you have not been too reliant on the Michigan SID for your record &amp; statistical information.  That reliance has caused Coach Hoke to refer to the 2011-12 Wolverine squad as Team 132 &amp; claim the 11 win victory total as the fifth in team history. In fact, last season&#8217;s  Michigan squad was Team 134. I include two teams that the Athletic Department does not, the 1878-79 &amp; 1882-83 teams that only played games in the spring. Remember, the academic year does not coincide with the calendar year. Michigan&#8217;s 2011-12 eleven wins were matched or exceeded by eight previous Michigan teams: 1901(11), 1902 (11), 1903 (11), 1905 (12), 1971 (11), 1986 (11), 1997 (12), &amp; 2006 (11).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Irreconcilable Truths by Kurt O'Keefe</title>
		<link>http://johnubacon.com/2012/01/irreconcilable-truths/#comment-3257</link>
		<dc:creator>Kurt O'Keefe</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 29 Jan 2012 12:33:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://johnubacon.com/?p=715#comment-3257</guid>
		<description>Reconciled?  
No, how many of us can reconcile the Jekyll and Hyde sides of our own character?
Judged?
&quot;Judge not, lest ye not be judged.&quot;

However, I think he must be judged, strongly, and negatively, and permanently.
I don&#039;t care if he raised 100 billion dollars and cured cancer, the buck at Penn State stopped at his desk and he passed it, when the authority and gravitas and larger than life personality and power, that he created, made him THE guy with the responsibility to PROTECT THE INNOCENT.
What would Bo do?
Does anyone have to think about it?
What generation does not understand that there is NO acceptable reason for a naked 50 plus year old man to be in a shower naked with a 12 year old boy?
End of story. 
Out, now, banned, referred to law enforcement, all his actions from birth on investigated, the parents of every minor you could find in your files on Sandusky contacted and informed.
Well, privacy and blah, blah, blah.
Informed that the SOB was naked in the shower with a naked kid, he did not even deny that, did he?
Even the above scenario is too slow; this should have been done at the first report.
This is the Catholic church scandal all over again.  Cover up by the higher ups.
That is why Paterno should be made an example of, to deter the next legend, and everyone in a position of authority, that your reputation is RUINED forever for this kind of negligence.
That you, the boss, are responsible, and, accountable.
I am dead serious.
The name of the library should be changed, and the statue toppled.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Reconciled?<br />
No, how many of us can reconcile the Jekyll and Hyde sides of our own character?<br />
Judged?<br />
&#8220;Judge not, lest ye not be judged.&#8221;</p>
<p>However, I think he must be judged, strongly, and negatively, and permanently.<br />
I don&#8217;t care if he raised 100 billion dollars and cured cancer, the buck at Penn State stopped at his desk and he passed it, when the authority and gravitas and larger than life personality and power, that he created, made him THE guy with the responsibility to PROTECT THE INNOCENT.<br />
What would Bo do?<br />
Does anyone have to think about it?<br />
What generation does not understand that there is NO acceptable reason for a naked 50 plus year old man to be in a shower naked with a 12 year old boy?<br />
End of story.<br />
Out, now, banned, referred to law enforcement, all his actions from birth on investigated, the parents of every minor you could find in your files on Sandusky contacted and informed.<br />
Well, privacy and blah, blah, blah.<br />
Informed that the SOB was naked in the shower with a naked kid, he did not even deny that, did he?<br />
Even the above scenario is too slow; this should have been done at the first report.<br />
This is the Catholic church scandal all over again.  Cover up by the higher ups.<br />
That is why Paterno should be made an example of, to deter the next legend, and everyone in a position of authority, that your reputation is RUINED forever for this kind of negligence.<br />
That you, the boss, are responsible, and, accountable.<br />
I am dead serious.<br />
The name of the library should be changed, and the statue toppled.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on The Beginning of a Great Rivalry by johnubacon</title>
		<link>http://johnubacon.com/2012/01/the-beginning-of-a-great-rivalry/#comment-3239</link>
		<dc:creator>johnubacon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 28 Jan 2012 16:54:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://johnubacon.com/?p=706#comment-3239</guid>
		<description>This is true, and included Scott Skiles&#039; famous &quot;fat boy&quot; taunts of Antoine Joubert at Crisler, which I still think we&#039;re funny.  And clearly effective!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is true, and included Scott Skiles&#8217; famous &#8220;fat boy&#8221; taunts of Antoine Joubert at Crisler, which I still think we&#8217;re funny.  And clearly effective!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Irreconcilable Truths by bob robinson</title>
		<link>http://johnubacon.com/2012/01/irreconcilable-truths/#comment-3237</link>
		<dc:creator>bob robinson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 28 Jan 2012 15:55:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://johnubacon.com/?p=715#comment-3237</guid>
		<description>his true character is revealed when after turning down Don Canhans offer because he was going to a bowl and Canham said he could not wait, was to never mention it, at Canhams request, until years later when Canham did</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>his true character is revealed when after turning down Don Canhans offer because he was going to a bowl and Canham said he could not wait, was to never mention it, at Canhams request, until years later when Canham did</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Irreconcilable Truths by Ned Glysson</title>
		<link>http://johnubacon.com/2012/01/irreconcilable-truths/#comment-3226</link>
		<dc:creator>Ned Glysson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Jan 2012 23:26:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://johnubacon.com/?p=715#comment-3226</guid>
		<description>May be your best.  Thank you for helping me sort it out.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>May be your best.  Thank you for helping me sort it out.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on The Beginning of a Great Rivalry by Mark N.</title>
		<link>http://johnubacon.com/2012/01/the-beginning-of-a-great-rivalry/#comment-3124</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark N.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Jan 2012 12:48:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://johnubacon.com/?p=706#comment-3124</guid>
		<description>Just one minor quibble with your comment that MSU &quot;wasn&#039;t close&quot; in 1986.  In fact, MSU finished 3rd in the Big Ten that year at 12-6 and beat Michigan twice by double-digit scores.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just one minor quibble with your comment that MSU &#8220;wasn&#8217;t close&#8221; in 1986.  In fact, MSU finished 3rd in the Big Ten that year at 12-6 and beat Michigan twice by double-digit scores.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on The Beginning of a Great Rivalry by Patrick Friedrich</title>
		<link>http://johnubacon.com/2012/01/the-beginning-of-a-great-rivalry/#comment-3059</link>
		<dc:creator>Patrick Friedrich</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 21 Jan 2012 02:26:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://johnubacon.com/?p=706#comment-3059</guid>
		<description>As long as Michigan &amp; Ohio State remain in different divisions, that rivalry will diminish in intensity. This past season, I found myself rooting for Ohio State to beat Michigan State &amp; Nebraska. By the same token, I&#039;m sure there were Ohio State fans that were rooting for Michigan to beat Purdue &amp; Illinois. Further, an Ohio State win against a Leaders Divisional foe doesn&#039;t hurt Michigan&#039;s chances at a Legends Division championship. As long as Michigan State is in the same division, they will always be on Michigan&#039;s radar. As long as Ohio State is in a different division, they will only be on Michigan&#039;s radar when they play each other.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As long as Michigan &amp; Ohio State remain in different divisions, that rivalry will diminish in intensity. This past season, I found myself rooting for Ohio State to beat Michigan State &amp; Nebraska. By the same token, I&#8217;m sure there were Ohio State fans that were rooting for Michigan to beat Purdue &amp; Illinois. Further, an Ohio State win against a Leaders Divisional foe doesn&#8217;t hurt Michigan&#8217;s chances at a Legends Division championship. As long as Michigan State is in the same division, they will always be on Michigan&#8217;s radar. As long as Ohio State is in a different division, they will only be on Michigan&#8217;s radar when they play each other.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Bowled Over by Kurt O'Keefe</title>
		<link>http://johnubacon.com/2012/01/bowled-over/#comment-2945</link>
		<dc:creator>Kurt O'Keefe</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Jan 2012 02:13:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://johnubacon.com/?p=693#comment-2945</guid>
		<description>Well, you&#039;ve caught me going off the top of my head before, but, only two teams from the Big Ten could go to a bowl game for the 1975 season, my senior year.  The Orange Bowl said they would gladly take the loser of the UM-Ohio game.
Not sure when that brilliant crew of ADs voted, it was clearly after the 10-0-1 season of 1973 when we were denied a bowl, it took effect after another 10-1 season (1972 being the first) when we were again denied a bowl.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, you&#8217;ve caught me going off the top of my head before, but, only two teams from the Big Ten could go to a bowl game for the 1975 season, my senior year.  The Orange Bowl said they would gladly take the loser of the UM-Ohio game.<br />
Not sure when that brilliant crew of ADs voted, it was clearly after the 10-0-1 season of 1973 when we were denied a bowl, it took effect after another 10-1 season (1972 being the first) when we were again denied a bowl.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

